Info@fairpriceessays.com

Call us: +1 (347) 632-0583

Instant Quote

 
  • FREE formating
  • FREE amendments
  • FREE revisions
  • FREE title page
  • FREE outline
  • Premium quality
  • 24/7 support
  • All subjects
  • Punctual & fast
  • Experienced writers
  • Archive for the ‘Essays’ Category

    Download the Organizational Chart and the Meeting Overview

    Download the Organizational Chart and the Meeting Overview
    The R&D organization has decided it wants to promote total involvement and create a learning organization. The community-building meeting is the mechanism to move this forward. You have decided to bring in other consultants from the Working Better Group to help you plan this meeting.

    The group has agreed to collaborate on the following three goals:

    Organizing the total community into teams for the various events and exercises that will take place.<br />
    Recommending an icebreaker exercise, and identifying the key learning points that will come from the exercise.<br />
    explains the Johari Window matrix and lists guidelines for increasing the open area. These guidelines should specifically identify how the individuals at the meeting should try to act. You also need to identify the best time during the meeting to present this information.

    The meeting will take place over 3 consecutive days. A total of 350 people will attend.<br />
    Open communication is going to be important, so you want to provide some guidelines for sharing information and listening to feedback.<br />
    introducing the Johari Window as a way to increase open communication.

    When will you present this information at the meeting so it will have the most impact?

    Consider the key events and tie it to one of them, either as a learning from the event or as preparation so to increase the effectiveness of the event.<br />
    Add this presentation to the Meeting Overview document.

    https://class.aiu-online.com/LCMSFileShareCommon/70e/193/50d/dbf/4d5/c96/499/12b/787/102/ff/105600a.pdf

    https://class.aiu-online.com/LCMSFileShareCommon/efe/8ed/181/cad/4fd/4af/f8c/4bf/331/91c/71/105600b.pdf

    PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT :)

     

    Read More | Order Now

    Judging people by their looks and speech

    Judging people by their looks and speech

    Many people claim that they can easily guess another person ethnic background by
    simply looking at them or listening to their English. Can you do that?
    Seriously, how do you guess ethnicity of a stranger? In most cases we don’t
    pay too much attention to this issue: after all we are human beings. However, many
    people do sometimes express curiosity about another person’s background. And
    let’s be honest: many of us guess all the time. The easiest way to make sure is to
    ask: “Where are you from?” and many of us here this all the time. However, what
    if you don’t have a chance or don’t want to ask this question? How do you guess?

    Write a brief report about how other people make judgments and guess about your
    ethnic or birth origin.

    How often do other people guess your birth origin (West Virginia, New Jersey,
    Somalia, El Salvador, Pakistan, etc.)?

    What do people usually say, without knowing you, about where you are from?

    Do you pay most attention to the way you speak or to something else, like clothes
    or jewelry you wear?

    Are they usually correct in their guessing and what do they say when they make a
    mistake?

    Do you sometimes trick people about your origin?

    Finally, how do you guess other people’s ethnic backgro
    PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT :)

     

    Read More | Order Now

    Poniatowska’s “The Night Vistor” and Castellanoos “Culinary Lesson”

    Poniatowska’s “The Night Vistor” and Castellanoos “Culinary Lesson”

    Feminist perspective in Poniatowska’s “The Night Vistor” and Castellanoos “Culinary Lesson”
    Compare and contrast the feminist perspective in Poniatowska’s “The Night Visitor” and Castellanos’ “Culinary Lesson”

    PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT :)

     

    Read More | Order Now

    Say It Ain’t So

    Say It Ain’t So

    PART A. Read and mark Stanley Fish’s “Say It Ain’t So”(on Blackboard; download and print)

    PART B. Developing Key Terms

    B1. Before you read the piece, select at least 2 words from the reading that are unfamiliar to you. For each word, 1) write the entire sentence in which it appears 2) try to write a definition of the word based on what you think it means in this sentence, 3) look the word up in the dictionary and write the dictionary definition that best fits the word in this sentence.

    B2. After you read the piece, for each word, use the word in a sentence that you created.

    (Don’t just copy a sentence from the dictionary! One of the best ways to learn vocabulary is to try using it on your own.)
    PART C. Making Connections (1-2 pages, typed, double-spaced, in Times New Roman font)

    What is Fish’s project? What is he trying to accomplish in writing this text? Make sure to provide textual evidence.
    How might Anzaldua respond to Fish’s argument and why?
    PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT :)

     

    Read More | Order Now

    Sociology The Tipping Point

    Sociology The Tipping Point
    Its about the book “The Tipping Point” By Malcolm Gladwell
    The paper has to be “How I respond to the book and what I think about the book?”
    PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT :)

     

    Read More | Order Now

    United States v. O’Hagan found in Reed et al. (2005)

    United States v. O’Hagan found in Reed et al. (2005)
    Instructions
    Upon completion of the Required Readings, write a thorough, well-planned narrative answer to each of the following discussion questions. Rely on your Required Readings and the Lecture and Research Update for specific information to answer each discussion question, but turn to your original thoughts when asked to apply, evaluate, analyze, or synthesize the information. Your Discussion Question responses should be both grammatically and mechanically correct, and formatted in the same fashion as the questions themselves. If there is a Part A, your response should identify a Part A, etc. In addition, you must appropriately cite all resources used in your responses and document in a bibliography using APA style.

    Read the case of United States v. O’Hagan found in Reed et al. (2005), Chap. 16, pp. 496-498, and answer the following questions. (25 points) (A 1 1/2 page response is required.)

    a) What was O’Hagan accused of and what was the theory used by the SEC to argue that he violated the law?
    b) According to the Supreme Court, when and against whom did the wrongful conduct occur?
    c) What reasons did the Supreme Court give for its holding?

    PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT :)

     

    Read More | Order Now

    Screening: “Adaptation”

    Screening: “Adaptation”
    Reading: A Theory of Adaptation,
    by Linda Hutcheon, Chapter 1 (http://lib.myilibrary.com/Open.aspx?id=80944)
    Journal Question: Briefly discuss Linda Hutcheon’s definition of adaptation. Is fidelity important in adaptation? Is it possible? In what way is “Adaptation” faithful to the source material?

    2,Screening: “Wuthering Heights” (2011)
    Journal Question: Why adapt familiar work? Refer to the screening of Wuthering Heights as a case in point. Why do we continue to watch classics?

    3, Dramatic Structure I Screening: “Kiss Kiss Bang Bang”
    Journal Question: What is the target of KKBB’s parody? Compare/contrast its deconstruction to “Adaptation”. Do either or both derive their approach from the source material?

    4, Screening: “Infernal Affairs”
    Journal Question: How does adaptation affect genre? How does movie story structure differ from literary story structure?

    5 Screening: “The Departed” Moving Story: When/Where
    Journal Question: What key changes must we make if we ‘re-culturize’ an adaptation? How does this affect Genre?

    6 Other Sources Screening: “The Social Network”
    Journal Question: What is the role(s) of dialogue in a drama?

    7 Scene Style/Pitching Screening: ”The Hours”
    Journal Question: 1. How would you describe the story structure of this film? Does it correspond to the Architecture of Action (AoA)? If not, how might we describe this?
    2. This is a “second degree” adaptation, i,e. an adaptation of an adaptaton; do we still have a relationship to the original material, Mrs Dalloway? Does it produce intertextual engagement with the source material?

    8 Making It Play Screening: “Game of Thrones” & “Dexter”
    Journal Questions: Name three key points from the scenes read in class.
    How do characters from series television differ from those in one-of feature films?

    9 Screen: Anna Karenina:
    Journal Question: How does this story ‘fast-forward’ the action to handle long source material? This story is not typically cinematic in it’s construction. How does it use the theatricality? What does the this add to the story? In your opinion, does it work? Why?

    10 Making It Play Screening: “Ghost World”
    Journal Questions: What are the main challenges to adapting from comix or graphic novels?

    11 Making It Play Screening: “Hunger Games”
    Journal Question: What are the challenges to adapting current best-seller stories?

    PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT :)

     

    Read More | Order Now

    Tiananmen Square Protests

    Tiananmen Square Protests

    Internet assignment for HIST 130. In l989 serious democratic protests erupted in China, with many students gathering in Tiananmen Square. After a tense stand-off, the Chinese government broke up the protests with armed force. As if you were asked to write a paper on this moment, research this event on the web. Consult at least 5 different websites (but not Wikipedia,News websites, off limits!) for information on the tragedy; also look at bloggers to see why this event still is important in contemporary debate.

    Within one page (SINGLE SPACED), evaluate the sites you have consulted: how reliable are they? Whose viewpoint is represented? Is it biased or objective? Why is it important? Is it reliable? Are any “neutral.” DO NOT describe the event but evaluate your sources of information.

    PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT :)

    Read More | Order Now

    Scientific review of the article

    Scientific review of the article

    Write a scientific review of the article (3-3.5 pages) summarizing the article in APA format. This review will include answers to the following questions.
    A. What is the hypothesis?
    B. What are the variables?
    C. What research method was utilized in the study? Describe.
    D. Who were the participants?
    E. What is the summary of the findings?
    F. What are the limitations to the study?
    G. What could be possible extensions to the research?
    3. Paper Content
    Your final paper will have five pages:
    o the title page
    o the body of the paper: 3 to 3.5 pages answering the questions A-G
    o the reference page
    The title page should include:
    o the title of your paper. Your title must be different from the author’s title. Otherwise it looks like you are saying you wrote their paper (and that would be considered plagiarism).
    o your name.
    o the name of the class.
    o the date.
    The body of the paper should include (note the use of citation):
    o an introduction. This should present the specific subject matter being discussed clearly and concisely. An example of such an introduction might be:
    John Smith (2008) states that Major Depressive Disorder is being seen more often as a teenage problem, more prevalent in females than in males and appears to be being diagnosed at an alarming rate. A recently reviewed article on this disorder discusses two new treatments options and their relative effectiveness. The researchers hypothesized that the best treatment would include… (and so on)
    Or:
    Current treatments for Major Depressive Disorder must take into account the age of the patient. Play therapy has been used with great success when working with young children, whereas cognitive strategies appear to be effective with adolescents and older adults. It is hypothesized that the most effective is the…and so on… (Helms, 2007).
    o paragraphs answering questions A-G in summary format.
    o concluding remarks. These remarksshould restate the introductory concept, summary statement, limitations and possible directions for related research. A conclusion might look like this:
    This study added to the understanding of depression as far as teenagers are concerned. Further research will need to be conducted in order to assess treatment effectiveness for ….
    The reference page
    o contains only one reference (the article you are reviewing).

    Assignment Segment 1:Find and select your article. You might be asking yourself. Why is she giving so many points for this? :) I can tell you that finding and selecting an article is an entire process in itself! Do not underestimate the amount of time it will take you to find a suitable article.
    Step 1: Please listen to the WCJC Library Orientation and the Citation Skills and Plagiarism Prevention instructional videos at http://wcjc.edu/Students/Library/Research-Help/tutorials.aspxAddressed will be questions such as:
    o What is the difference between Academic/Scholarly journals and magazines?
    o How does one evaluate research material for authority and credibility?
    This will ensure that you select an actual peerreviewed research article. This means a Wikipedia entry; drug insert, simple web page or a magazine article will not be acceptable. You are welcome to email me articles to check for acceptability before submitting your final article selection.

    Step 2: Access the Library Database
    The Library
    You may access WCJC subscription databases through the page of the library proxy server at http://libproxy.wcjc.cc.tx.us/login or visit the WCJC web site at http://wcjc.edu. Select Library, choose Search Databases and click on Online Databases (Proxy Server). . You will need to enter:
    Username: Your last name (either upper or lower case is fine)
    Password: Your birth date (Entered as MMDDYYYY Example: 01211976)

    If you need further help on library resources, please contact the librarians at 281-243-8417, 281-239-1619 or 979-532-6953 or by email at wcjclibrary@wcjc.edu. Students can also visit the library and/or learning labs on each campus for computer and research help.
    Tip: How to get to the WCJC Library from here:
    1. Go to the WCJC main page.
    2. Click on Library.
    3. Look for Find Articles- Academic Journals and Newspapers.
    4. Click on Databases-Library Proxy Server.
    5. You will see a log on page for the library.
    6. Enter your username and password (last name and birth date).
    7. You will see the Database Menu.
    8. Look for Educational & Social Sciences Collection (EBSCO).
    9. Find Psychology & Behavioral Sciences Collection.
    10. You will see a search box.
    11. Search for your topic.
    Step 3: Sift through multiple articles until you find one that is suitable. If you have been looking though some research articles, you may have noticed most of them have a similar structure. The guidelines for the structure are established by the APA (American Psychological Association). These are the major sections of a journal article:
    • The Abstract: This is the short paragraph at the beginning of the article. It consists of a brief overview of the article. It states concisely what kind of information the article is covering. This is a quick way to eliminate articles that aren’t relevant to your topic or to identify an applicable topic.
    • The Introduction: In this section, the research problem is introduced and a review of the literature and previous research is introduced. This section helps a student to understand the basics or background of the topic being researched. The current topic of investigation is introduced. Here you will find the hypothesis.
    • The Method Section: The exact detail of the research (how it was conducted) is in this section. Here you will find the independent and dependent variables, the research method, the population needed for your article review.
    • The Results Section: This section tells what the researchers found during their study. This is where you will find the summary of the findings (probably in the discussion section, too.)
    • The Discussion Section: This is where you will find the interpretations of the study, limitations of the research, and possible suggestions for future research in this topic.
    • The References Section: This section identifies all the resources or references that were used in this article.
    1. Try to find an article that has a clear indicator of the option PDF Full Text.
    2. Be sure the article matches the criteria for the assignment and you can clearly answer questions A-G.
    3. Open PDF Full Text.
    4. Download it to your computer.
    Step 4: Save your article to your computer in PDF format. Not all articles in the library are in PDF format so look carefully. Again, you may email me your article if you are at all unsure of its suitability. Please do not procrastinate if you want me to approve of your article. If I am swamped the day before the article selection is due, I may not get to last minute submissions. Please consider this forewarning!
    Step 5: Upload your article into the Segment 1 Assignment link. See submission directions above the link.

    Assignment Segment 2:The Outline
    I want to see a work in progress! ?
    Step 1: Make your article your best friend. :) At this point you will be becoming intimately familiar with your article. I expect it will take several readings to get the main points outlined.
    Step 2: Take notes on each section (see article sections in Segment 1 notes). The information in these sections will answer A-G below. These notes will make up your basic outline for your final paper, so be specific and thoughtful while doing this! Don’t forget about your introduction and conclusion! Paraphrase (write in your own words) the information in the article. Do not use quotes.
    Step 3: Create your outline. Your outline should answer these questions.
    A. What is the hypothesis?Look for what the researchers are trying to test; what is the purpose of aim of the study?
    B. What are the variables (both independent and dependent, if experimental)? Typically the independent variables are what is being studied (ie medication vs. therapy); and the dependent variables are the results of some testing instrument; the different scores on these tools for measuring the differences. If not experimental, what is being addressed or researched?
    C. What research method was utilized in the study? What kind of research was conducted?This also answers the question: what did the researchers do? Interview the subjects, gave them a test, etc.
    D. Who were the participants? (define the population and sample)? Who was studied? Define the actual people that were studied, and their characteristics.
    E. What is the summary of the findings?This is the overall findings and can be found usually in the abstract and discussion section.
    F. What are the limitations to the study? Most research states the limitations of the study directly. These limitations are typically found in the discussion section. You may suggest some limitations of your own, if you like.
    G. What could be possible extensions to the research?Most studies answer this question directly as well in the discussion section. You may include some ideas for extensions, if you like.
    Our outline may be in bullet format but I want it quite complete.You will notice your outline earns you many points so give it your full attention. You will be using it to write your final paper so give yourself plenty of time. Tips:
    o I want to see clear reference to A-G.
    o Please avoid unnecessary information.
    o This is a scientific review and so there is no need to add personal opinions. The only place personal opinions are acceptable is if you had an addition to the limitations or ideas for extensions.
    Step 4: Upload your outline into the Segment 2 Assignment link. See submission directions above the link.

    Assignment Segment 3:APA Format
    Step 1: Become familiar with the format.
    What in the world is APA format? :)
    American Psychological Association (APA) writing style used by the American Psychological Association. It is detailed fully in the American Psychological Association Publication Manual located in any library or bookstore. For those of you who are continuing in the psychology field, I highly recommend you buy the publication manual. For those of you not wishing to buy the manual, there are online web sites devoted to explaining this style of writing (see online tools in the WCJC online library under APA Style, or type APA Style as a keyword search on the Internet).
    Also see: http://www.apastyle.org/apa-style-help.aspx for a tutorial. It takes about 20 minutes to watch. You will not need all of this information but it is good to bookmark this site for future use. Also, become familiar with the WCJC web sites and links for the Psychology Dept: http://www.wcjc.edu/Programs/social-and-behavioral-sciences/psychology/internet-resources.aspx
    Step 2: Make a detailed list of how you will need to format your final paper. Do not copy and paste anything I have written! This means viewing the web links and information I have provided and making a list of your own. This information is basically given to you below. All you need to do is restate it.
    This is what I want to see for APA format:
    1. A Title Page: see previously listed criteria.
    2. A Reference Page:
    • The word References should be centered on the page. (It is not called ‘Works Cited’ as in MLA style.) For this paper there will be only one reference. Remember to double space the reference.
    • Use a hanging indent (used in APA style references). What does that mean? Find out!
    3. Use no. 12, Times New Roman font, double space the whole paper (including cover page and references) and use 1 inch margins. Don’t put gaps between paragraphs; it is all simply double spaced.
    4. Include manyAPA in-text citations:
    Your paper should cite the author(s) frequently throughout the paper. After you have summarized/paraphrased a portion of the article, there must be a citation that identifies the source of that research. Simply enclose in parenthesis only the last name (or last names) of the author/s and the year of the publication.
    Examples:
    The research clearly illustrated that although there was a positive correlation between staying up all night to complete a research paper and getting it turned in on time, the attention span of the student was shown to suffer a great deal on the following day (McElroy, 2009).
    Another way to use an in-text citation is as follows:
    McElroy et al. (2009) has stated that the year of research publication, in parenthesis, can simply follow the author or authors’ last name/s at the beginning of a passage that has been reviewed and summarized. Either cite at the very beginning of a passage or at the very end, not both. Note that multiple authors are cited using last names and the year of publication as stated previously and as is done in the text. If there are more than three authors, cite all authors the first time the reference occurs, and thereafter in subsequent citations only cite the first author followed by et al. as is done at the beginning of this paragraph.
    Note: the references cited within the article being reviewed (there will often be many, as this is scientific research and as such it builds on the research of others), are not to be cited in this paper or listed as references. Only the actual article in hand and being used need be cited.
    Other:
    o Do not use
    o “creative” fonts
    o bolding
    o underlining
    o direct quotes. Instead, paraphrase the research using words which best summarize and describe it, and then cite the reference used.
    o “etc.” State the information meant to be imparted.
    Step 3: Upload your list Assignment Segment 3 link. See submission directions above the link.
    Assignment Segment 4:Final APA Paper
    Step 1: Write your paper using your outline.
    Step 2: Apply APA formatting to your paper.
    Step 3: See a tutor review, if necessary. WCJC does have tutoring available for those students who are in need of assistance in writing this paper. They are versed in APA style of writing. Smarthinking also is available through your Online Services to provide tutoring completely online. Be sure to give yourself plenty of time for the online tutor to respond.
    Step 4: Review the following:
    • Proofread your paper
    • Spell check your paper
    • Grammar check your paper
    • See that your paper is completed within one document in the following order: title page, body of paper (3 – 3 1/2 pages), and the reference page.
    • Review your paper for the standard rules for sentence and paragraph composition, writing, and grammar.
    • Indent at the beginning of a paragraph.
    • Make sure that each paragraph is well organized, having topic and supporting sentences.
    • Remove any use of personal pronouns (I, they, you, we, etc.) as this is research, not personal or anecdotal views.
    • Stay away from subjective statements, hyperbole, or pronouncements (This is a terrible disorder….) (They should stop this disorder…) (A cure must be found for…). This is a scientific review, not a position or opinion paper.
    • Check to see that the in-text citations and the reference page entries include the information that is required.
    Step 5: Upload your Final APA Paper into the Assignment Segment 4 link. See submission directions above the link.
    Step 6: Do something to reward yourself for your dedication and hard work on this assignment! :)

    PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT :)

    Read More | Order Now

    Biomedical Ethics

    Biomedical Ethics

    Directions: You are to write an essay in which you provide an analysis of the medical ethics case called “The Wilbur Williams Case.” You are to give a clear and carefully reasoned answer to the question: What ought the doctor(s) do in this case? To do so, you are to use the Four-Step Decision Model for Ethical Case Analysis that we have utilized so far in the course. This means you will need to:

    0.) Make sure you have the facts of the case clear,
    1.) Generate a list of clear possible alternative courses of action that the surgeon could take,
    2.) Evaluate each of these possible alternatives in light of the doctor’s relationship to the patient (and in light of the patient’s capacity for autonomous decision-making), and his role as a physician,
    3.) Identify whatever else (if anything) is morally at stake in the alternatives, and
    4.) Come to a clearly stated judgment about what you think the surgeon ought to do based on your careful weighing of the moral/ethical considerations done in Steps 2 and 3.

    Notes about composing your essay:

    NOTE #1: CAPACITY JUDGMENT! In this case, you are NOT to necessarily assume that the patient, Wilbur, is a capable decision-maker. I want you to make an explicit determination about whether or not you think Wilbur is capable of making an autonomous decision about a course of treatment in the case. You can do this at the beginning, or as part of your Step 2 work. This means that you will need to make detailed reference to the evidence from the case presented to you, and use some criteria (perhaps Ozar’s list) to defend your opinion as to whether Wilbur is capable, partially capable, or incapable of making a decision for himself. Make sure that you understand the appropriate response for each of these determinations. Note also that this means you cannot just offer up an alternative about having a psychiatric consult for Wilbur; this does NOT satisfy this part of the exam. You need to make this determination for yourself, using the evidence from the case. THIS REQUIREMENT IS DIFFERENT FROM THE FIRST CASE (and very important to this particular case), SO DO NOT OVERLOOK THIS!

    NOTE #2: You are to assume that the patient’s wife Nellie in the case is a capable decision-maker. This means that any hesitations you might have about accepting her judgments are differences in judgment between you and her, not as evidence of a capacity deficit on her part. (This is not to say that you are required to view her judgments as correct and well-reasoned; obviously a person who is capable can also make errors in judgment!) So alternatives that call for a psychiatric consult to determine the capability of Nellie are thus not appropriate.

    NOTE #3: In formulating your list of alternatives it is important to think about the case from many angles, in order to generate a list that includes many different possibilities, not just ones you judge to be morally/ethically acceptable. Thus including alternatives that you find “clearly morally wrong” at face value can help your analysis by bringing important ethical issues to light.

    NOTE #4: It is possible that you have more medical knowledge about the situation in this case than the case’s author has included (especially since this case took place several years ago). Even so, you are to assume that the medical information recounted and the medical judgments attributed to the physicians in the case are the medical facts with which you must work. In other words, since you are, in effect, thinking for the doctors in the case, you are to assume that they are fully medically competent rather than examining whether they have made (or will make) technical medical errors in the case.

    NOTE #5: When evaluating the moral/ethical implications of your alternatives, remember that you are to be answering the ethicalquestion of what the doctor should do in this case, not the legal question. That is not to say that legal considerations are out-of-bounds for your analysis; in fact they can play an important role. But simply coming to a judgment that “She should do X because that’s what her legal obligation is” does not necessarily answer the moral question of the case. (While her legal obligation may be clear in this case, this in no way clears up the ethical considerations that are involved in the situation.)

    NOTE #6: In offering a judgment about what you think should be done in the case, make sure that you are coming to a clearly reasoned, practically possible decision. Thus the alternative(s) that you select must attempt to deal with the central ethical issues of the case, and be something that can actually be enacted by the surgeon in reality.

    NOTE #7: It is possible that you decide that a combination of alternatives should be done, rather than just one. This is perfectly fine, provided that you do some thinking about the possibilities that may arise from your enacting part one of your alternatives combo. In other words, if you enact an alternative that has the possibility of not directly solving the central ethical issue of the case, you need to clearly explain what other alternative(s) you would be prepared to enact (depending upon the outcome of alternative #1), and why.
    Your completed essay (of at least three full, double-spaced pages) is due IN CLASS on THURSDAY APRIL 17, printed out and handed in as hard copy. I will NOT accept papers via email. Please STAPLE your paper before coming to class (if you do not staple it, I am not responsible for any lost pages). Please also number your pages. Exceptions to this deadline will only be made in the case of extreme, unforeseen emergencies.

    You have plenty of time to read the case, brainstorm about the ethical issues involved in the case, what possible things the doctors could do, and try to work out a carefully reasoned argument analyzing these issues and explaining why you think a certain alternative(s) is best. I would be happy to discuss the case with you, and I encourage you to come by my office hours to chat about the issues of the case. I will also read rough drafts, up until 48 hours prior to the above deadline. You are also welcome to discuss and think about the case with classmates, but every student must compose their own essay in which they provide their own individual analysis and argument.
    PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT :)

     

     

    Read More | Order Now
    • 10+ years experience in writing.
    • A wide range of services
    • Satisfied and returning customers
    • 100% privacy guaranteed
    • Only custom-written papers
    • Free amendments upon request